On Mon 26-11-12 01:38:55, azurIt wrote: > >This is hackish but it should help you in this case. Kamezawa, what do > >you think about that? Should we generalize this and prepare something > >like mem_cgroup_cache_charge_locked which would add __GFP_NORETRY > >automatically and use the function whenever we are in a locked context? > >To be honest I do not like this very much but nothing more sensible > >(without touching non-memcg paths) comes to my mind. > > > I installed kernel with this patch, will report back if problem occurs > again OR in few weeks if everything will be ok. Thank you! Thanks! > Btw, will this patch be backported to 3.2? Once we agree on a proper solution it will be backported to the stable trees. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>