* Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/21/2012 02:15 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >>As mentioned in my other mail, this patch of yours looks very > >>similar to the numa/core commit attached below, mostly written > >>by Peter: > >> > >> 30f93abc6cb3 sched, numa, mm: Add the scanning page fault machinery > > >Just to compare, this is the wording in "autonuma: memory follows CPU > >algorithm and task/mm_autonuma stats collection" > > > >+/* > >+ * In this function we build a temporal CPU_node<->page relation by > >+ * using a two-stage autonuma_last_nid filter to remove short/unlikely > >+ * relations. > > Looks like the comment came from sched/numa, but the original > code came from autonuma: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/629 Yeah, indeed, good find - thanks for tracking that down - to me it came from Peter. I'll add in an explicit credit to Andrea, the comment alone deserves one! Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>