On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:48:44 +0100 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As this patch is already in -next and is stuck there for two more > > weeks I can't (or at least won't) merge this patch, so I can't help > > with any of the above. > > I will fix both issues in the next version of the patch. Would like to > merge it to your tree or should I keep it in my dma-mapping tree? The patch looks OK to me now (still wondering about the -stable question though). It would be a bit of a pain for me to carry a patch which conflicts with one in linux-next, and this patch doesn't appear to conflict with the other pending dmapool.c patches in -mm so you may as well keep it in the dma-mapping tree now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>