On 11/15/2012 01:41 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > (2012/11/15 11:54), Glauber Costa wrote: >> The idea is to synchronously do it, leaving it up to the shrinking >> facilities in vmscan.c and/or others. Not actively retrying shrinking >> may leave the caches alive for more time, but it will remove the ugly >> wakeups. One would argue that if the caches have free objects but are >> not being shrunk, it is because we don't need that memory yet. >> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> >> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I agree this patch but can we have a way to see the number of unaccounted > zombie cache usage for debugging ? > > Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Any particular interface in mind ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>