Re: [patch 1/4] mm, oom: ensure sysrq+f always passes valid zonelist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 14-11-12 03:03:02, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > > With hotpluggable and memoryless nodes, it's possible that node 0 will
> > > not be online, so use the first online node's zonelist rather than
> > > hardcoding node 0 to pass a zonelist with all zones to the oom killer.
> > 
> > Makes sense although I haven't seen a machine with no 0 node yet.
> 
> We routinely do testing with them, actually, just by physically removing 
> all memory described by the SRAT that maps to node 0.  You could do the 
> same thing by making all pxms that map to node 0 to be hotpluggable in 
> your memory affinity structure.  I've been bit by it one too many times so 
> I always keep in mind that no single node id is guaranteed to be online 
> (although at least one node is always online); hence, first_online_node is 
> the solution.

I thought that a boot cpu would be bound to a node0 or something similar.
Thanks for the clarification!

> > According to 13808910 this is indeed possible.
> > 
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> 
> Thanks!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]