On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Our QA noticed a regression in one of our i915/GEM testcases in 3.7: > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56859 > > Direct link to dmesg of the machine: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=70052 Note that the > machine is 32bit, which seems to be important since Chris Wilson > confirmed the bug on his 32bit Sandybridge machine, whereas mine here > with a 64bit kernel works flawlessly. > > The testcase is gem_tiled_swapping: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/tree/tests/gem_tiled_swapping.c > > Quick high-level description of the workload: > > It allocates a working set larger than available memory, then fills it > by writing it through the gpu gart (required to get a linear view of > tiled buffers) and afterwards reads it to check whether anything got > corrupted. Since the working set is too large to fit into ram, this > will force all buffers through swap. We've written this testcase to > exercise the reswizzle swapin path since some platforms have a tiling > layout depending upon physical pfn (awesome feature btw), but not snb. > So within the kernel this workload simply grabs the backing storage > from shmemfs with shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp and then binds them into > the gpu pagetables (the GTT). This happens in the i915_gem_fault > fucntion. Unbinding in this workload happens either directly (if the > gem code can't get enough memory) or through our shrinker > (i915_gem_inactive_shrink). Swapout is then left to shmemfs to handle. > All the above stuff is in drivers/gpu/drm/i915_gem.c > > Testcase fails because it detects a mismatch between what has been > written and what has been read back. > > Our qa people bisected the regression to > > commit 7f1290f2f2a4d2c3f1b7ce8e87256e052ca23125 > Author: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Oct 8 16:33:06 2012 -0700 > > mm: fix-up zone present pages > > and confirmed the revert on top of the latest drm-intel-nightly branch > (which is based on top of 3.7-rc2 and contains the -next stuff for > 3.8). They've also tested the for-QA branch which had latest Linus > upstream merged in, which did not fix the problem. For reference the > intel trees are at (but I don't think it matters really that it's not > plain upstream, nothing really changed in the relevant i915/gem paths > compared to upstream): > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel > > I have no idea how that early boot zone init fix could even corrupt > swapping in such a fashion, so ideas highly welcome. QA people are > cc'ed, and hopefully I haven't missed anyone else on the cc list. > You can take a look at this thread: [PATCH] mm: fix a regression with HIGHMEM introduced by changeset 7f1290f2f2a4d http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/5/866 I think it's the same problem. -- Regards, --Bob -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>