What do you guys think about this mprotect() optimization? Thanks, Ingo -- Ingo Molnar (1): mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection() users Peter Zijlstra (1): sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual memory ranges include/linux/hugetlb.h | 8 ++++++-- include/linux/mm.h | 6 +++--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- mm/hugetlb.c | 10 ++++++++-- mm/mprotect.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>