On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > > Why? Is xen using it for a different inference? > > > > I think it is good to separate these patches. Dan (copied here) wrote the code for the > > Xen self balloon driver. If it is ok with him I can submit the patch for Xen as well. > > Hi KY -- > > If I understand correctly, this would be only a cosmetic (function renaming) change > to the Xen selfballooning code. If so, then I will be happy to Ack when I > see the patch. However, Konrad (konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx) is the maintainer > for all Xen code so you should ask him... and (from previous painful experience) > it can be difficult to sync even very simple interdependent changes going through > different maintainers without breaking linux-next. So I can't offer any > help with that process, only commiseration. :-( > I think this should be done in the same patch as the function getting introduced with a cc to Konrad and routed through -mm; even better, perhaps he'll have some useful comments for how this is used for xen that can be included for context. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>