Re: [PATCH v6 19/29] memcg: infrastructure to match an allocation to the right cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu,  1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> > +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
> 
> I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.

AFAIU, __always_inline (resp. __attribute__((always_inline))) is the
same thing as inline if optimizations are enabled
(http://ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-always_inline).
Which is the case for the kernel. I was always wondering why we have
this __always_inline thingy.
It has been introduced back in 2004 by Andi but the commit log doesn't
say much:
"
[PATCH] gcc-3.5 fixes
    
Trivial gcc-3.5 build fixes.
"
Andi what was the original motivation for this attribute?
 
> I don't recall seeing the compiler producing out-of-line versions of
> "static inline" functions

and if it decides then __always_inline will not help, right?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]