On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > I am embarrassed because recently I have tried to promote zram > from staging tree. > > I thought it's very stable because our production team already have > used recent zram on ARM and they don't report any problem to me until now. > But I'm not sure how they use it stressfully so I will check it. > And other many project of android have used it but I doubt it's recent zram > so it would be a problem of recent patch. > > Anyway I will look at it but unfortunately, as I said earlier, I should go > to training course during 2 weeks. So reply will be late. > I hope other people involve in during that. > > Thanks for the reporting. No, it is I who should be embarrassed because my results were premature and I jumped the gun. The backport of ToT to 3.4 didn't work correctly, even if it compiled. I was getting OOPSes in zram data transfers on x86---never mind ARM. I am now trying a safer approach, by just applying the patch that removes the x86 dependency. I have tested that change on x86 and it works fine (perhaps a bit more sluggish? Could be subjective). I am still working on getting the ARM side properly tested. Thank you and I hope your training goes well. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>