On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 18:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ({ \
> > sizeof(val) <= 4 ? hash_32(val, bits) : hash_long(val, bits); \
> > })
> >
> > Is the better way to go. We are C programmers, we like to see the ?: on
> > a single line if possible. The way you have it, looks like three
> > statements run consecutively.
>
> If we're C programmers, why use the non-standard statement-expression
> at all? And split it onto three lines when it's just a single one?
I like the blue color over the pink. Anyway, I was just expressing an
opinion and really didn't care if it was changed or not.
>
> But whatever. This series has gotten way too much bike-shedding
> anyway. I think it should just be applied, since it does remove lines
> of code overall. I'd even possibly apply it to mainline, but it seems
> to be against linux-next.
I would think this change is a bit too big for an -rc4 release, but
you're the boss. I've already given my ack for my code that this set
touches. Let it go to Stephen's repo then.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>