From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
memblock_find_in_range_node() does not compare memblock.current_limit
with end variable. Thus even if memblock.current_limit is smaller than
end variable, the function allocates memory address that is bigger than
memblock.current_limit.
The patch adds the check to "memblock_find_in_range_node()"
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memblock.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index ee2e307..50ab53c 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -100,11 +100,12 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
phys_addr_t align, int nid)
{
phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand;
+ phys_addr_t current_limit = memblock.current_limit;
u64 i;
/* pump up @end */
- if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
- end = memblock.current_limit;
+ if ((end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) || (end > current_limit))
+ end = current_limit;
/* avoid allocating the first page */
start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>