On 10/02/2012 01:17 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > If so, <shake hands> and move forward? What do you see as next steps? I've been reviewing the changes between zcache and zcache2 and getting a feel for the scope and direction of those changes. - Getting the community engaged to review zcache1 at ~2300SLOC was difficult. - Adding RAMSter has meant adding RAMSter-specific code broadly across zcache and increases the size of code to review to ~7600SLOC. - The changes have blurred zcache's internal layering and increased complexity beyond what a simple SLOC metric can reflect. - Getting the community engaged in reviewing zcache2 will be difficult and will require an exceptional amount of effort for maintainer and reviewer. It is difficult for me to know when it could be ready for mainline and production use. While zcache2 isn't getting broad code reviews yet, how do suggest managing that complexity to make the code maintainable and get it reviewed? Seth -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>