On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:44:35AM +0100, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On x86 memory accesses to pages without the ACCESSED flag set result in the > > ACCESSED flag being set automatically. With the ARM architecture a page access > > fault is raised instead (and it will continue to be raised until the ACCESSED > > flag is set for the appropriate PTE/PMD). > > > > For normal memory pages, handle_pte_fault will call pte_mkyoung (effectively > > setting the ACCESSED flag). For transparent huge pages, pmd_mkyoung will only > > be called for a write fault. > > > > This patch ensures that faults on transparent hugepages which do not result > > in a CoW update the access flags for the faulting pmd. > > > > Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Ok chaps, I rebased this thing onto today's next (which basically > > necessitated a rewrite) so I've reluctantly dropped my acks and kindly > > ask if you could eyeball the new code, especially where the locking is > > concerned. In the numa code (do_huge_pmd_prot_none), Peter checks again > > that the page is not splitting, but I can't see why that is required. > > In handle_mm_fault() we check if the pmd is under splitting without > page_table_lock. It's kind of speculative cheap check. We need to re-check > if the PMD is really not under splitting after taking page_table_lock. I appreciate the need to check whether the thing is splitting, but I thought that the pmd_same(*pmd, orig_pmd) check after taking the page_table_lock would be sufficient, because we know that the entry hasn't changed and that it wasn't splitting before we took the lock. This also mirrors the approach taken by do_huge_pmd_wp_page. Is there something I'm missing? Cheers, Will -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>