* Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its > > own; it wants to be compared to either a total of interleave > > allocations or to a miss count, remove it. > > > > Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years > > without these statistics I figure we can continue that way. > > > > Also NUMA_HIT fully includes NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT so users > > might switch to using that. > > > > This cleans up some of the weird MPOL_INTERLEAVE allocation > > exceptions. > > NACK, as already posted several times. > > This breaks the numactl test suite, which is the only way > currently to test interleaving. This patch is not essential to the NUMA series so I've zapped it from the patch queue and fixed up the roll-on effects. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>