On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Your description doesn't include why we need new vmevent_fd(2). > Of course, it's very flexible and potential to add new VM knob easily but > the thing we is about to use now is only VMEVENT_ATTR_PRESSURE. > Is there any other use cases for swap or free? or potential user? > Adding vmevent_fd without them is rather overkill. What ABI would you use instead? On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't object but we need rationale for adding new system call which should > be maintained forever once we add it. Agreed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>