On 10/23/2012 06:12 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> I do agree, but since freeing is ultimately dependent on the allocator >> layout, I don't see a clean way of doing this without dropping tears of >> sorrow around. The calls in slub/slab/slob would have to be somehow >> inlined. Hum... maybe it is possible to do it from >> include/linux/sl*b_def.h... >> >> Let me give it a try and see what I can come up with. > > The best solution would be something that would have a consolidated > kmem_cache_free() in include/linux/slab.h. > I don't know what exactly do you have in mind, but since the cache layouts are very different, this is quite hard to do without incurring without function calls anyway. Do take a look at what I sent in response to that, and tell me what do you think. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>