Re: [PATCH v5 15/18] Aggregate memcg cache values in slabinfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/19/2012 11:50 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> 
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * We use suffixes to the name in memcg because we can't have caches
>> + * created in the system with the same name. But when we print them
>> + * locally, better refer to them with the base name
>> + */
>> +static inline const char *cache_name(struct kmem_cache *s)
>> +{
>> +	if (!is_root_cache(s))
>> +		return s->memcg_params->root_cache->name;
>> +	return s->name;
>> +}
> 
> Could we avoid this uglyness? You can ID a slab cache by combining a memcg
> pointer and a slabname.
> 
But that is not what I want.

What I want is to show the cache by its root name in memcg-specific
slabinfo.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]