On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:44PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote: > > At 09/14/2012 09:36 AM, Hugh Dickins Wrote: > > > > > > Description to be filled in later: would it be needed for -stable, > > > or is onlining already broken in other ways that you're now fixing up? > > > > > > Reported-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi, all: > > > > What about the status of this patch? > > Sorry I'm being so unresponsive at the moment (or, as usual). > > When I sent the fixed version afterwards (minus mistaken VM_BUG_ON, > plus safer mem_cgroup_force_empty_list), I expected you or Konstantin > to respond with a patch to fix it as you preferred (at offline/online); > so this was on hold until we could compare and decide between them. > > In the meantime, I assume, we've all come to feel that this way is > simple, and probably the best way for now; or at least good enough, > and we all have better things to do than play with alternatives. > > I'll write up the description of the fixed version, and post it for > 3.7, including the Acks from Hannes and KAMEZAWA (assuming they carry > forward to the second version) - but probably not today or tomorrow. Mine does, thanks for asking :-) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>