On 10/18/2012 02:12 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:16:44 +0400 > Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> When a process tries to allocate a page with the __GFP_KMEMCG flag, the >> page allocator will call the corresponding memcg functions to validate >> the allocation. Tasks in the root memcg can always proceed. >> >> To avoid adding markers to the page - and a kmem flag that would >> necessarily follow, as much as doing page_cgroup lookups for no reason, >> whoever is marking its allocations with __GFP_KMEMCG flag is responsible >> for telling the page allocator that this is such an allocation at >> free_pages() time. > > Well, why? Was that the correct decision? > I don't fully understand your question. Is this the same question you posed in patch 0, about marking some versus marking all? If so, I believe I should have answered it there. If not, please explain. >> This is done by the invocation of >> __free_accounted_pages() and free_accounted_pages(). > > These are very general-sounding names. I'd expect the identifiers to > contain "memcg" and/or "kmem", to identify what's going on. > Changed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>