Re: mpol_to_str revisited.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Last month I sent in 80de7c3138ee9fd86a98696fd2cf7ad89b995d0a to remove
> a user triggerable BUG in mempolicy.
>
> Ben Hutchings pointed out to me that my change introduced a potential leak
> of stack contents to userspace, because none of the callers check the return value.
>
> This patch adds the missing return checking, and also clears the buffer beforehand.

I don't think 80de7c3138ee9fd86a98696fd2cf7ad89b995d0a is right fix. we should
close a race (or kill remain ref count leak) if we still have.
Because of, this patch makes unstable /proc output and might lead to
userland confusing.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]