On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 10:45 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:34:55AM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:28 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > > Up until 07 Oct, drivers/video/wm8505-fb.c was working fine, but on the
> > > 11 Oct when I did another pull from linus all of a sudden
> > > dma_alloc_coherent is failing to allocate the framebuffer any longer.
> > >
> > > I did a quick look back and found this:
> > >
> > > ARM: add coherent dma ops
> > >
> > > arch_is_coherent is problematic as it is a global symbol. This
> > > doesn't work for multi-platform kernels or platforms which can support
> > > per device coherent DMA.
> > >
> > > This adds arm_coherent_dma_ops to be used for devices which connected
> > > coherently (i.e. to the ACP port on Cortex-A9 or A15). The arm_dma_ops
> > > are modified at boot when arch_is_coherent is true.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the only patch lately that I could find (not that I would claim
> > > to be any good at finding things) that is related to the problem. Could
> > > it have caused the allocations to fail?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Tony P
> >
> > Have done a bit more digging and found the cause - not Rob's patch so
> > apologies.
> >
> > The cause of the regression is this patch:
> >
> > From f40d1e42bb988d2a26e8e111ea4c4c7bac819b7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:32:36 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm: compaction: acquire the zone->lock as late as
> > possible
> >
> > Up until then, the framebuffer allocation with dma_alloc_coherent(...)
> > was fine. From this patch onwards, allocations fail.
> >
>
> Was this found through bisection or some other means?
>
> There was a bug in that series that broke CMA but it was commit bb13ffeb
> (mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were
> isolated) and it was fixed by 62726059 (mm: compaction: fix bit ranges
> in {get,clear,set}_pageblock_skip()). So it should have been fixed by
> 3.7-rc1 and probably was included by the time you pulled in October 11th
> but bisection would be a pain. There were problems with that series during
> development but tests were completing for other people.
>
> Just in case, is this still broken in 3.7-rc1?
Still broken. Although the printk's might have cleared it up a bit.
>
> > I don't know how this patch would effect CMA allocations, but it seems
> > to be causing the issue (or at least, it's caused an error in
> > arch-vt8500 to become visible).
> >
> > Perhaps someone who understand -mm could explain the best way to
> > troubleshoot the cause of this problem?
> >
>
> If you are comfortable with ftrace, it can be used to narrow down where
> the exact failure is occurring but if you're not comfortable with that
> then the easiest is a bunch of printks starting in alloc_contig_range()
> to see at what point and why it returns failure.
>
> It's not obvious at the moment why that patch would cause an allocation
> problem. It's the type of patch that if it was wrong it would fail every
> time for everyone, not just for a single driver.
>
I added some printk's to see what was happening.
from arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c: arm_dma_alloc(..) it calls out to:
dma_alloc_from_coherent().
This returns 0, because:
mem = dev->dma_mem
if (!mem) return 0;
and then arm_dma_alloc() falls back on __dma_alloc(..)
I suspect the reason this fault is a bit 'weird' is because its
effectively not using alloc_from_coherent at all, but falling back on
__dma_alloc all the time, and sometimes it fails.
Why it caused a problem on that particular commit I don't know - but it
was reproducible by adding/removing it.
Regards
Tony P
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>