On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 17:58 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > This is a backport of the series "Memory policy corruption fixes V2". This > should apply to 3.6-stable, 3.5-stable, 3.4-stable and 3.0-stable without > any difficulty. It will not apply cleanly to 3.2 but just drop the "revert" > patch and the rest of the series should apply. > > I tested 3.6-stable and 3.0-stable with just the revert and trinity breaks > as expected for the mempolicy tests. Applying the full series in both case > allowed trinity to complete successfully. Andi Kleen reported previously > that the series fixed a database performance regression[1]. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/585 > > include/linux/mempolicy.h | 2 +- > mm/mempolicy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) I've queued up patches 2-5 for 3.2, thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part