Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 12-10-12 11:47:17, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 08-10-12 14:06:15, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> Because kmem charges can outlive the cgroup, we need to make sure that
> >> we won't free the memcg structure while charges are still in flight.
> >> For reviewing simplicity, the charge functions will issue
> >> mem_cgroup_get() at every charge, and mem_cgroup_put() at every
> >> uncharge.
> >>
> >> This can get expensive, however, and we can do better. mem_cgroup_get()
> >> only really needs to be issued once: when the first limit is set. In the
> >> same spirit, we only need to issue mem_cgroup_put() when the last charge
> >> is gone.
> >>
> >> We'll need an extra bit in kmem_accounted for that: KMEM_ACCOUNTED_DEAD.
> >> it will be set when the cgroup dies, if there are charges in the group.
> >> If there aren't, we can proceed right away.
> >>
> >> Our uncharge function will have to test that bit every time the charges
> >> drop to 0. Because that is not the likely output of
> >> res_counter_uncharge, this should not impose a big hit on us: it is
> >> certainly much better than a reference count decrease at every
> >> operation.
> >>
> >> [ v3: merged all lifecycle related patches in one ]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > OK, I like the optimization. I have just one comment to the
> > memcg_kmem_dead naming but other than that
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > [...]
> >> +static bool memcg_kmem_dead(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > 
> > The name is tricky because it doesn't tell you that it clears the flag
> > which made me scratch my head when reading comment in kmem_cgroup_destroy
> > 
> memcg_kmem_finally_kill_that_bastard() ?

memcg_kmem_test_and_clear_dead? I know long but at least clear that the
flag is cleared. Or just open code it.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]