On Thu 11-10-12 12:11:19, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 08-10-12 14:06:10, Glauber Costa wrote: > > + cgroup_lock(); > > + mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex); > > + if (!memcg->kmem_accounted && val != RESOURCE_MAX) { > > Just a nit but wouldn't memcg_kmem_is_accounted(memcg) be better than > directly checking kmem_accounted? OK, I see that jump lable patch changes this and we set activated inside the conditional so kmem_accounted check catches both flags. That could be changed to memcg_kmem_is_activated in that patch but what ever. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>