On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Fengguang, was that this error? Why hasn't it showed up before in the > > test system? > > I do find this error in the build error log: > > (.text+0x867f): undefined reference to `sock_update_memcg' > 2012-09-24 04:54:53 snb next:akpm:69921c3 x86_64-randconfig-s005 0a7f618 > > Unfortunately it was not reported because the build system could > miss/ignore build bugs due to various reasons/imperfections. It has > since then undergo lots of enhancements and as a result, the daily > reported errors have more than doubled. :-) > Not sure where this discussion is going. Do people who can't build their kernel and have a fix for it need to verify that your build system shows the same thing first? This isn't a false positive. As I said in the first message, Randy reported this on September 24 (the same date you're reporting above) and received no response when he reported it to LKML here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134852557320089 Regardless, Linus' tree is messed up and I don't think we need to go back reverting patches out of his tree when it's trivial to fix with my patch, which Michal acked. Sheesh. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>