On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 05:16:44PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:27:34AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote: > > +cc Peter due to uffd interests > > Gentle nudge for Peter to make himself uffd maintainer :) I am not a fan of > this 'happen to know person X often touches Y' stuff, this is what > MAINTAINERS is for. If you're not there, good chance I won't cc you... > > I also strongly feel we need somebody to take overall responsibility for > uffd at this point. > > Pints will be bought for this person in Montreal ;) Thanks for the offer, though I will be absent from lsfmm this year. I sent a maintainer file change here, though: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250322002124.131736-1-peterx@xxxxxxxxxx/ Maybe someone would like to be the 2nd reviewer, and if he/she would be at the conference maybe the pints will still count? :) [...] > > I hate both of them, and I (mostly) blame uffd. Some blame is on syzbot > > for exposing me to this unreachable failure. ;-) > > So do I. I agree with Jann; AFAIU, userfaultfd is innocent, if it used to work. I don't think I have followed much on the recent vma mgmt changes. So I am almost of no use here.. I'll leave that to you experts. Beers indeed might help. Said that, it'll definitely be very appreciated if the old behavior can be fully recovered, so release() will never fail at such -ENOMEM. Thanks, -- Peter Xu
