[PATCH v5 1/9] riscv: Safely remove huge_pte_offset() when manipulating NAPOT ptes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The pte_t pointer is expected to point to the first entry of the NAPOT
mapping so no need to use huge_pte_offset(), similarly to what is done
in arm64.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 375dd96bb4a0..3192ad804279 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ int huge_ptep_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	order = napot_cont_order(pte);
 	pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
-	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
 	orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
 
 	if (pte_dirty(orig_pte))
@@ -334,7 +333,6 @@ void huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	order = napot_cont_order(pte);
 	pte_num = napot_pte_num(order);
-	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, addr, napot_cont_size(order));
 	orig_pte = get_clear_contig_flush(mm, addr, ptep, pte_num);
 
 	orig_pte = pte_wrprotect(orig_pte);
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux