On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:53:23 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 01:36:55PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote: > > > > Patch 1 and Patch 2 are closely related, and I believe that both patches > > need to be combined to fully support the functionality. > > > > Initially, I thought that Patch 1 was the fix for the original issue and > > considered it the candidate for a backport. > > However, upon further reflection, I believe that all changes in Patch 1 > > through Patch 3 are necessary to fully address the underlying problem. > > > > Therefore, I now think it makes more sense to merge Patch 1 and Patch 2 > > into a single patch, then renumber the current Patch 3 as Patch 2, > > and treat the entire set as a proper -stable backport candidate. > > > > I'd appreciate your thoughts on this suggestion. > > > > Rakie > > > > All of this is fine, but it doesn't fix the bug in LTS kernels :] > > It would be nice to do that too, since you identified it. > ~Gregory Following the previously discussed patch restructuring, are there any other bugs that remain unresolved? If you have any additional insights on these unresolved issues, I would appreciate your input. Rakie.
