Re: [RFC 2/4] blkdev: lift BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE to page cache limit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:01:46AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/20/25 4:13 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > -/*
> > - * We should strive for 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
> > - * however we constrain this to what we can validate and test.
> > - */
> > -#define BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE      SZ_64K
> > +#define BLK_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE      1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER)
> >   /* blk_validate_limits() validates bsize, so drivers don't usually need to */
> >   static inline int blk_validate_block_size(unsigned long bsize)
> 
> All logical block sizes above 4 KiB trigger write amplification if there
> are applications that write 4 KiB at a time, isn't it? Isn't that issue
> even worse for logical block sizes above 64 KiB?

I think everybody knows this Bart.  You've raised it before, we've
talked about it, and you're not bringing anything new to the discussion
this time.  Why bring it up again?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux