On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:38:01AM +0800, Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, binding the statistics to the memory.reclaim writers may not be
> suitable for our scenario. The userspace proactive memory reclaimer triggers
> proactive memory reclaim on different memory cgroups, and all memory reclaim
> statistics would be tied to this userspace proactive memory reclaim process.
It thought that was what you wanted -- have stats related precisely to
the process so that you can feedback-control the reclaim.
> This does not distinguish the proactive memory reclaim status of different
> cgroups.
a
`- b
`- c
Or do you mean that you write to a/memory.reclaim and want to observe
respective results in {b,c}/memory.stat?
(I think your addition to memory.stat is also natural. If the case above
is the explanation why to prefer it over per-writer feedback, please
mention that in next-rev commit message.)
Thanks,
Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
