Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Split proactive reclaim statistics from direct reclaim statistics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:58:32PM +0800, Hao Jia wrote:
> From: Hao Jia <jiahao1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In proactive memory reclaim scenarios, it is necessary to
> accurately track proactive reclaim statistics to dynamically
> adjust the frequency and amount of memory being reclaimed
> proactively. Currently, proactive reclaim is included in
> direct reclaim statistics, which can make these
> direct reclaim statistics misleading.
> 
> Therefore, separate proactive reclaim memory from the
> direct reclaim counters by introducing new counters:
> pgsteal_proactive, pgdemote_proactive, and pgscan_proactive,
> to avoid confusion with direct reclaim.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This is indeed quite useful.

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux