On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:51:55 -0500 Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > start only with memory.max as > > > that has some usecases). > > > > Yes, I can link [2] with more info added to the commit message. > > > > Johannes, do you want effective interface for low and min as well or for > > now just keep the current targeted interfaces? > > I think it would make sense to do min, low, high, max for memory in > one go, as a complete new feature, rather than doing them one by one. > > Tejun, what's your take on this, considering other controllers as > well? Does that seem like a reasonable solution to address the "I'm in > a namespace and can't see my configuration" problem? I guess Tejun missed this. It seems that more think time is needed on this patch?
