On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:40:02 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Gregory > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 03:34:10PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:14:48 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Given that this adjustment is part of integrating the refactored > > structure, I believe this patch does not need to be split into two. > > However, I would appreciate any further input you may have on this. > > > > Another way of saying this is: can you please change the ordering of > patch 2 and 3 and place the functional changes into "make mempolicy > support memory hotplug" patch. > > It's a little odd to "make mempolicy support memory hotplug" and then > follow that up with a patch that says "now make it REALLY support it". > > Patch 2 should read: > "Refactor weighted_interleave sysfs to allow node structure to be > dynamic" > Patch 3 should read: > "Make weighted interleave sysfs structure support memory hotplug" > > I think you'll find the patches end up looking much cleaner this way as > well. > > ~Gregory Your suggestion seems appropriate. I will rearrange the order as you suggested when creating version 3. Rakie
