Re: [PATCH] mm: use %pK for /proc/vmallocinfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Kees Cook wrote:

> >> In the paranoid case of sysctl kernel.kptr_restrict=2, mask the kernel
> >> virtual addresses in /proc/vmallocinfo too.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Brad Spengler <spender@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > /proc/vmallocinfo is S_IRUSR, not S_IRUGO, so exactly what are you trying
> > to protect?
> 
> Trying to block the root user from seeing virtual memory addresses
> (mode 2 of kptr_restrict).
> 
> Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt:
> "This toggle indicates whether restrictions are placed on
> exposing kernel addresses via /proc and other interfaces.  When
> kptr_restrict is set to (0), there are no restrictions.  When
> kptr_restrict is set to (1), the default, kernel pointers
> printed using the %pK format specifier will be replaced with 0's
> unless the user has CAP_SYSLOG.  When kptr_restrict is set to
> (2), kernel pointers printed using %pK will be replaced with 0's
> regardless of privileges."
> 
> Even though it's S_IRUSR, it still needs %pK for the paranoid case.
> 

So root does echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict first.  Again: what 
are you trying to protect?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]