On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:01:20 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:23:18AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote: > > madvise_dontneed_single_vma() and madvise_free_single_vma() support both > > batched tlb flushes and unbatched tlb flushes use cases depending on > > received tlb parameter's value. The supports were for safe and fine > > transition of the usages from the unbatched flushes to the batched ones. > > Now the transition is done, and therefore there is no real unbatched tlb > > flushes use case. Remove the code for supporting the no more being used > > cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Obviously I support this based on previous preview :) but I wonder if we > can avoid this horrid caller_tlb pattern in the first instance. I will try, though I have no good idea for that for now. Maybe we could simply squash patches 7-9. I'm bit concerned if it makes changes unnecessariy mixed and not small, but I have no strong opinion about it. Please feel free to let me know if you want that. > > FWIW: > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> Appreciate your reviews! Thanks, SJ [...]
