Hello, I'd like to know what's the current status of each allocator regarding its targeted scenario. According to my numbers: * slob very small static footprint, low internal fragmentation, doesn't scale well. targeted at really small embedded. * slub default allocator, low internal fragmentation, suites well most scenarios. * slab high internal fragmentation, we still have it because slub showed some unfixed (performance?) regression in some scenario. Anyone can add anything useful to this quick comparison? Thanks, Ezequiel. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>