Re: [PATCH] mm: Avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_name.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:46:44 +0530
raghu.prabhu13@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Following section mismatch warning is thrown during build;
> 
>     WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x32408f): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_type_name() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock
>     The function memblock_type_name() references
>     the variable __meminitdata memblock.
>     This is often because memblock_type_name lacks a __meminitdata
>     annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong.
> 
> This is because memblock_type_name makes reference to memblock variable with
> attribute __meminitdata. Hence, the warning (even if the function is inline).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 82aa349..8e7fb1f 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
>  static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
>  
>  /* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
> -static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
> +static inline __init_memblock
> +		const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
>  {
>  	if (type == &memblock.memory)
>  		return "memory";

huh.  If your compiler inlines that function, you won't get the
warning.  Another reason why inline-considered-harmful nowadays.  Let's
just nuke it.

Also, please note the code layout issue.  There are two ways we'll
typically handle a definition like that:

static inline __init_memblock const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)

or

static inline __init_memblock const char *
memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)


You chose neither ;)

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix

remove inline

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 mm/memblock.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN mm/memblock.c~mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix mm/memblock.c
--- a/mm/memblock.c~mm-avoid-section-mismatch-warning-for-memblock_type_name-fix
+++ a/mm/memblock.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ static int memblock_memory_in_slab __ini
 static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
 
 /* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
-static inline __init_memblock
-		const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
+static __init_memblock const char *
+memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
 {
 	if (type == &memblock.memory)
 		return "memory";
_

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]