在 2025/3/4 02:30, Uladzislau Rezki 写道: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:44:07PM +0800, Liu Ye wrote: >> The same operation already exists in the function __get_vm_area_node, >> so delete the duplicate operation to simplify the code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Liu Ye <liuye@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> mm/vmalloc.c | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c >> index dc658d4af181..20d9b9de84b1 100644 >> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c >> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c >> @@ -3798,7 +3798,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, >> shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size); >> >> align = max(real_align, 1UL << shift); >> - size = ALIGN(real_size, 1UL << shift); >> } >> >> again: >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > There is a mess with: > > unsigned long real_size = size; > unsigned long real_align = align; > > "real_size" and "real_align". Those are useless. What is about: Sorry, the order of the patches may be misleading. The correct order is as follows: PATCH1. mm/vmalloc: Size should be used instead of real_size " PATCH2. mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof PATCH3. mm/vmalloc: Remove the real_size variable to simplify the code " PATCH4. mm/vmalloc: Rename the variable real_align to original_align to prevent misunderstanding If PATCH1 is the correct fix, then consider PATCH2, PATCH3, and PATCH4. > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 5c88d0e90c20..a381ffee1595 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -3771,8 +3771,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, > struct vm_struct *area; > void *ret; > kasan_vmalloc_flags_t kasan_flags = KASAN_VMALLOC_NONE; > - unsigned long real_size = size; > - unsigned long real_align = align; > unsigned int shift = PAGE_SHIFT; > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!size)) > @@ -3781,7 +3779,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, > if ((size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages()) { > warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL, > "vmalloc error: size %lu, exceeds total pages", > - real_size); > + size); > return NULL; > } > > @@ -3798,19 +3796,18 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, > else > shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size); > > - align = max(real_align, 1UL << shift); > - size = ALIGN(real_size, 1UL << shift); > + align = max(align, 1UL << shift); > } > > again: > - area = __get_vm_area_node(real_size, align, shift, VM_ALLOC | > + area = __get_vm_area_node(size, align, shift, VM_ALLOC | > VM_UNINITIALIZED | vm_flags, start, end, node, > gfp_mask, caller); > if (!area) { > bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL; > warn_alloc(gfp_mask, NULL, > "vmalloc error: size %lu, vm_struct allocation failed%s", > - real_size, (nofail) ? ". Retrying." : ""); > + size, (nofail) ? ". Retrying." : ""); > if (nofail) { > schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); > goto again; > @@ -3860,7 +3857,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, > (gfp_mask & __GFP_SKIP_ZERO)) > kasan_flags |= KASAN_VMALLOC_INIT; > /* KASAN_VMALLOC_PROT_NORMAL already set if required. */ > - area->addr = kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(area->addr, real_size, kasan_flags); > + area->addr = kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(area->addr, size, kasan_flags); > > /* > * In this function, newly allocated vm_struct has VM_UNINITIALIZED > @@ -3878,8 +3875,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align, > fail: > if (shift > PAGE_SHIFT) { > shift = PAGE_SHIFT; > - align = real_align; > - size = real_size; > goto again; > } > > ? > > -- > Uladzislau Rezki