On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 12:55:36AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote: >On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:28:53AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote: >>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [250211 03:11]: >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:31:28AM -0500, Liam R. Howlett wrote: >>> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx> [250207 20:26]: >>> > >>> >The subject of this patch set makes the issue sound much more sever than >>> >it is. It currently sounds like a memory leak or a UAF, which isn't the >>> >case. >>> > >>> >>> Not intend to exaggerate the impact. >>> >>> Is this one would be better? >>> >>> maple_tree: make sure each node is dead on destroy >> >>Not really, you are fixing two nodes, one isn't even to do with the >>destry/dead node. You are also not making sure each node is dead, but >>fixing an issue with the leaf node. >> >>maple_tree: Fix the replacement of a root leaf node ? >> > >One more question, would it be better to use this as the subject of patch 1? > Liam, Are you ok with this and can I send a v2? >-- >Wei Yang >Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
