On 03/03/25 9:39 pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:44:06PM +0800, Liu Ye wrote:The use of variables real_size and real_align in function __vmalloc_node_range_noprof is unreadable. Optimize it in four patches. Liu Ye (4): mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof mm/vmalloc: Size should be used instead of real_size in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof mm/vmalloc: Remove the real_size variable to simplify the code in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof mm/vmalloc: Rename the variable real_align to original_align to prevent misunderstanding mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --Let me double check it. Quick question, this series does not introduce any functional change?
Yeah, the cover letter subject is misleading. IMHO it should be more like "Refactor" instead of "Optimize".
-- Uladzislau Rezki
