On 10/01/2012 04:36 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, >>> right? >>> >> >> Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we >> will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still >> using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted. > > Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next > version? > Of course. I haven't sent it yet because I also received a lot more feedback for the slab part (which is expected), and I want to get a least part of that going before I send it again. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>