Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:56:04 +0530
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250228-mm-selftests-v3-5-958e3b6f0203@google.com>
References: <20250228-mm-selftests-v3-0-958e3b6f0203@google.com> <20250228-mm-selftests-v3-5-958e3b6f0203@google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird



On 28/02/25 10:24 pm, Brendan Jackman wrote:

So this can be debugged more easily.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>


Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests/mm: Some cleanups from trying to run them
  - From: Brendan Jackman
- [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params
  - From: Brendan Jackman

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] KVM: guest_memfd: Enforce NUMA mempolicy using shared policy
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] selftests/mm: Drop unnecessary sudo usage
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params
Next by thread: [PATCH v3 06/10] selftests/mm: Don't fail uffd-stress if too many CPUs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux