I was wondering how others live with the git send-email all the time, so I searched for alternatives. Then I found out that some people use terminal email clients like Mutt, and learned that the inline patch is the right way, not attached. Let me do the inline patch if there are more chances in the future. On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:03 PM bus710 <bus710@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 3:07 PM bus710 <bus710@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:56 PM SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:37:03 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:42:04 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: bus710 <bus710@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Full names are preferred, please. Actually I think it's "required". > > > > > > Thank you for letting me clearly know this. I'll request full names to DAMON > > > patch authors from next time. > > > > > > bus710, we could still update the patch before it is merged into the mainline. > > > If you could, please let us know your full name and if we can update the patch > > > with that. > > > > > > > > > > > I'll apply it anyway due to the patch's minor nature, thanks. > > > > > > I agree this is a simple enough patch that the name doesn't really matter. > > > Thank you Andrew :) > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > SJ > > > > Oh, yes. I was a little worried if I added too much noise for such a > > small work, but I shouldn't miss this opportunity to leave my name in > > Linux history. > > Let me prepare a new patch as soon as possible. > > Hi all, > > Please find the attached patch. > Based on the latest one, from @Andrew Morton I just replaced my ID > with my real name as well as updated the subject. > > Thank you, > Seongjun Kim
