On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:21 PM Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I wanted to have the shadow memory boundries aligned properly, to not waste page > >> table entries, so the memory map is more straight forward. This patch helps with > >> that, I don't think it would have worked without it. > > > >Ok, I see - let's add this info into the commit message then. > > Sure, but if you like the 0xffeffc0000000000 offset I'll just drop this part. Sure, assuming it works, I like this address :) But to be fair, I like any fixed address better than using a runtime const, just to avoid the complexity.
