Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_alloc: Clarify terminology in migratetype fallback code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/24/25 19:42, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 13:37, Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  int find_suitable_fallback(struct free_area *area, unsigned int order,
>> -                       int migratetype, bool only_stealable, bool *can_steal);
>> +                       int migratetype, bool need_whole_block, bool *whole_block);
> 
> Agh, sorry, I was meant to rename all of these to claim_block.
> Apparently I got halfway through doing that then got distracted.
> 
> (Literally the whole point of this patch was to clean this up, and I
> somehow failed to actually do that!)

Given Johannes' patches went to mm-unstable meanwhile, this now expectedly
conflicts a lot so I'll wait with review for a new rebased version. Thanks!




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux