Re: [PATCH 3/3] memory_hotplug: Don't modify the zone_start_pfn outside of zone_span_writelock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/28/2012 03:29 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Hi, Chen,

On 09/27/2012 09:19 PM, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/27/2012 02:47 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
The __add_zone() maybe call sleep-able init_currently_empty_zone()
to init wait_table,

But this function also modifies the zone_start_pfn without any lock.
It is bugy.

So we move this modification out, and we ensure the modification
of zone_start_pfn is only done with zone_span_writelock() held or in booting.

Since zone_start_pfn is not modified by init_currently_empty_zone()
grow_zone_span() needs to check zone_start_pfn before update it.

CC: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Yasuaki ISIMATU <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   mm/memory_hotplug.c |    2 +-
   mm/page_alloc.c     |    3 +--
   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index b62d429b..790561f 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void grow_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
       zone_span_writelock(zone);
         old_zone_end_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;
-    if (start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
+    if (!zone->zone_start_pfn || start_pfn < zone->zone_start_pfn)
           zone->zone_start_pfn = start_pfn;
         zone->spanned_pages = max(old_zone_end_pfn, end_pfn) -
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index c13ea75..2545013 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3997,8 +3997,6 @@ int __meminit init_currently_empty_zone(struct zone *zone,
           return ret;
       pgdat->nr_zones = zone_idx(zone) + 1;
   -    zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
-
then how can mminit_dprintk print zone->zone_start_pfn ? always print 0 make no sense.

The full code here:

	mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_TRACE, "memmap_init",
			"Initialising map node %d zone %lu pfns %lu -> %lu\n",
			pgdat->node_id,
			(unsigned long)zone_idx(zone),
			zone_start_pfn, (zone_start_pfn + size));


It doesn't always print 0, it still behaves as I expected.
Could you elaborate?

Yeah, you are right. I mean mminit_dprintk is called after zone->zone_start_pfn initialized to show initialising state, but after this patch applied zone->zone_start_pfn will not be initialized before this print point.


Thanks,
Lai


       mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_TRACE, "memmap_init",
               "Initialising map node %d zone %lu pfns %lu -> %lu\n",
               pgdat->node_id,
@@ -4465,6 +4463,7 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_core(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
           ret = init_currently_empty_zone(zone, zone_start_pfn,
                           size, MEMMAP_EARLY);
           BUG_ON(ret);
+        zone->zone_start_pfn = zone_start_pfn;
           memmap_init(size, nid, j, zone_start_pfn);
           zone_start_pfn += size;
       }



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]