On 21/02/2025 15:35, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 07:10:32PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> Will, Ryan, >> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:13PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: >>> This series contains some fixes for hugetlb on arm64, and is split out from v1 >>> of a wider series at [1]. While the last patch is technically targetting core-mm >>> and is not directly related to arm64, I'd like to to go via the arm64 tree so >>> that the wider performance improvement series (v2 to be posted shortly) that >>> depends on this series doesn't have to be robust to the fix not being present. >>> >>> I've included maintainers/reviewers for all the arches that are (trivially) >>> touched due to the API changes, hoping for some ACKs. >> >> These fixes look fine to me and I think we should get them in for 6.14. >> I think Andrew was ok with them going in via the arm64 tree: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250205235219.3c3a4b968087d1386d708b04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > I think the diffstat looks worse than it really is, as the arch changes > are reasonably mechanical. I'd like to let it sit in next for a few days > though, so I'll pick this up once we've resolved my comment on patch #2. Sounds good to me; if you're happy with my proposal in the patch 2 thread, then I'll respin. > > Ryan -- did you find all of these issues by inspection, or are you aware > of anybody hitting them in practice? All by inspection. So I guess they are not urgent to fix from that perspective. > > Will
