On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:28 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Setup the maple_node_cache with percpu sheaves of size 32 to hopefully
> improve its performance.
I guess 32 might change in the future based on further testing?
> Change the single node rcu freeing in
> ma_free_rcu() to use kfree_rcu() instead of the custom callback, which
> allows the rcu_free sheaf batching to be used. Note there are other
> users of mt_free_rcu() where larger parts of maple tree are submitted to
> call_rcu() as a whole, and that cannot use the rcu_free sheaf, but it's
> still possible for maple nodes freed this way to be reused via the barn,
> even if only some cpus are allowed to process rcu callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index f7153ade1be5f16423f0ca073846a7f3dfa60523..56e7a00f6f0941bff163091c999a873e4273f071 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void mt_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> static void ma_free_rcu(struct maple_node *node)
> {
> WARN_ON(node->parent != ma_parent_ptr(node));
> - call_rcu(&node->rcu, mt_free_rcu);
> + kfree_rcu(node, rcu);
> }
>
> static void mas_set_height(struct ma_state *mas)
> @@ -6258,9 +6258,14 @@ bool mas_nomem(struct ma_state *mas, gfp_t gfp)
>
> void __init maple_tree_init(void)
> {
> + struct kmem_cache_args args = {
> + .align = sizeof(struct maple_node),
> + .sheaf_capacity = 32,
> + };
> +
> maple_node_cache = kmem_cache_create("maple_node",
> - sizeof(struct maple_node), sizeof(struct maple_node),
> - SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> + sizeof(struct maple_node), &args,
> + SLAB_PANIC);
> }
>
> /**
>
> --
> 2.48.1
>
