On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:14:37PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 04:43:22PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > <snip> > > > Do you have any plan to get it work with nolibc for all test programs in > > selftests/vDSO, not only the standalone x86 test ? > > Not directly as next step. I am focussing on some other work which will > integrate (vDSO) selftests with nolibc slightly differently. > However if you have interest in converting the tests now, that would be > great and will also be useful for my future changes. > The current issues I see: > * Missing architecture support in nolibc (should be fairly easy to implement) > * Missing kselftest_harness.h support in nolibc (I'm working on that) > * Maybe some users want to stick with their regular libc > (Nothing should prevent that, but the mechanism may need some discussion) BTW, I wanted to thank you for this work. Originally when I started with nolibc, I thought the vdso was out of reach due to the many missing definitions. Turns out you were braver than me ;-) Cheers, Willy
